(This letter was sent to Bishop Libasci on September 24, 2013. I have not yet had the courtesy of a reply)
September 24, 2013
Bishop Peter Anthony Libasci
Diocese
of Manchester
153 Ash St.
Manchester, NH 03104
Bishop Libasci,
Yesterday Father Gordon J. MacRae began
his 20th year in prison for crimes that never happened. Not only was he falsely accused and wrongly
imprisoned (for life: 33 ½ yrs. to 67 yrs.), but his own Diocese played
a major role in his sentencing. Bishop John McCormack, Fr. Edward Arsenault,
Bishop Christian, etc. – all of “sterling” character – distributed a press
release telling the public that Father Gordon was guilty of those crimes BEFORE
his trial. Everyone in the state had the
opportunity to see that press release - especially the jurors.
Father Gordon’s last correspondence
with his bishop was a letter telling him that he, Bishop McCormack, had sent a letter
to the Vatican, with no indication of what the letter was about. Bishop McCormack would not speak to or correspond
further with Father Gordon or with his canon lawyer, Fr. David Deibel.
Bishop Libasci and Bishop McCormack |
Bishop Libasci, when you arrived, we the
readers and the believers in justice, thought that at last a new bishop of the Diocese
of Manchester would surely look into his case and see how unfair the Diocese
had been to him, and would make some effort to correct that. We thought the new bishop would at least visit
Father Gordon since visiting prisoners (especially one of your own Diocese) is
one of the duties of a shepherd. Your predecessor and his advisers made
promises that were not kept. They deceived and lied to Father Gordon about how
personal documents pertaining to him were released by the Diocese and
published:
“When Bishop McCormack
signed an agreement with the Attorney General's Office to publish the files of
some 62 priests accused, a part of the agreement was that each priest would
have a ten-day period to review and challenge publication of any files pertaining
to him. Concerned that privileged legal documents and other materials produced
post-trial by Father MacRae were about to be published, the imprisoned priest
wrote to Father Edward Arsenault in January, 2003, asking that this ten-day
review be afforded to him. He received no reply.
Ten days after the files were published,
in March of 2003, Father MacRae received a letter from an attorney for the Diocese
describing what he must do to obtain his files and review them before the
release. The month-long delay in his receipt of that letter has never been
validly explained to him.
After the publication of
this vast release of files, Father MacRae wrote to both Bishop McCormack and
Attorney General Kelly Ayotte protesting the publication of files that were
fraudulently obtained by the Diocese and published without regard for the
priest's confidentiality rights. Bishop McCormack wrote that he tried to
prevent the publication of files that were confidential, but was not
successful. Attorney General Ayotte's representative wrote to Father MacRae
stating that all files obtained by a Grand Jury in New Hampshire are considered
confidential under law, but added that Bishop McCormack signed a waiver of
confidentiality enabling all the accused priests' files to be published.”
(“Bishop Takes Pawn:
Plundering the Rights of a Prisoner-Priest” by Ryan A. MacDonald, May 21, 2012,
ARamintheThicket.blogspot.com)
So much for truthfulness
to one of the Diocese’s priests. It appears that every dirty trick the Diocese
could do to Father Gordon, was done in triplicate. He has never said or written a negative word
against his Diocese or brother priests.
No one from his Diocese has ever visited him. In fact, the Diocese spread the word that
Father Gordon did not want to have anything to do with his Diocese or his
Church. He has written to some of the
priests of his Diocese and in turn received notes saying, “Please do not write
to me again.” Father Gordon has not become bitter. He has become a better
priest in prison and ministered to a lot more people in need than he could have
in a parish. He simply writes the truth and readers can make up their own minds
about his guilt or innocence.
What is also true is that
he deserves a second trial. So much has come out since he was sentenced. Bishop
McCormack told two people – although he now denies it – that he knew Father
Gordon was innocent. And yet the Diocese did not pay for an attorney (as promised) and
Father Gordon had very little money. He was represented by someone who did
not have his best interests in mind. Few people noticed the psychologist among
the onlookers who motioned when the accuser should cry during his testimony.
The judge – now a long-haired protester against the U.S. government
– issued a sentence that was in no way just or fair. Father Gordon is not eligible to apply for parole because he maintains his innocence. Thus, he must serve the entire 67 years which means he will die in prison or be 108 years old when released. He won’t live that long. He suffers from a number of illnesses, some for which he won’t take medication because the disease becomes worse when the patient has to go without the medication for weeks or even months. Because of the lackadaisical attitude of the medical personnel at the prison, and the ineptitude of the guards, a prisoner seldom gets his medication as prescribed.
Judge Arthur Brennan who sentenced Fr. Gordon to life and death in prison |
– issued a sentence that was in no way just or fair. Father Gordon is not eligible to apply for parole because he maintains his innocence. Thus, he must serve the entire 67 years which means he will die in prison or be 108 years old when released. He won’t live that long. He suffers from a number of illnesses, some for which he won’t take medication because the disease becomes worse when the patient has to go without the medication for weeks or even months. Because of the lackadaisical attitude of the medical personnel at the prison, and the ineptitude of the guards, a prisoner seldom gets his medication as prescribed.
Father Gordon is an
inspiration to many people in all parts of the world. One reader wrote:
With burning sorrow, I
think of you today on the 19th Anniversary of your wrongful imprisonment.
With God’s grace you have, no doubt at great cost to yourself, in reality
transcended that dreadful wrong. You are
an inspiration to thousands of your readers far beyond the beauty and charm of
what you write and even beyond the deft analysis you provide, but particularly
in the humility and Christ-like spirit you show forth…. May our loving Lord
grant you your release soon and Holy Mother Church at long last do the right thing
by you! You are an example of holiness and wisdom to us all!”
Bishop Libasci, I ask you too to be an example of holiness and
wisdom, and above all, to be the shepherd a bishop is supposed to be. Our Holy
Father, Pope Francis visits prisoners and writes to some priests in prison. How
can our bishops do any less?
Peace
and Blessings,
Charlene
C. Duline
No comments:
Post a Comment